バカラ タイ粧い

kBswwIvilWwj2006,13,63-77.

w]Lp
|A|1

The validity and utility of student evaluation of teaching: Relation of grade of examination

u

Takashi MATSUO

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to examine validity and utility in the student of evaluation teaching. The understanding level and the interesting level were asked per hour of the class. The relation between them and the final examination results was seen. As a result, the correlation was not seen in the entire student. But, a positive correlation was seen for the student with a lot of attendance frequencies in the result of an understanding level, an interesting level, and the final examination. As for the interesting, it was possible to prompt studying. However, the student with a little attendance frequency cannot correctly recognize the understanding level. In addition, the interesting did not promote study. Therefore, student evaluation of teaching was not necessarily valid. Moreover, there was little utility to the teacher evaluation and the class improvement, too.

PD

@w]IsC"cafeteria-style"]VXe(Algozzine, Beattie, Bray, Flowers, Gretes, Howley, Mohanty & Spooner, 2004)DwゥRLq]レxソ`ョsC]レx_CwWpDeqD@C(Cohen, 1981; Marsh, 1984; Koon & Murray, 1995; McKeachie, 1997; Johnson, 2000; Sproule, 2000)C{C]LpC_D

1.1@Lp

@JtFeAX^C]C]メwPwUI]C]eD,]C]wゥgiFC2004jDeCwxLpCeCFッDC`wDCqCwCxゥ\CA]EDCe]CJtFeAX^C]^D
@Cw]C]`LpD]]lヲCSCfD]PfCCPKvfCmDC]wC]wD]ヲI[lヲCfDr\CvOEiEC2005ajC]lC]lCD
@C]CPKvfCPiEC2005ajDCC]CPwewCPwI]]レxlLpD
@JtFeAX^C]CLyLpC]タ{ゥlDC{CwEタCw]A@D

1.2@]W

@wゥg]mC{Cwタ{]ADCw]WCwゥgx]mDWCeC^mッwmッDC`\DWCwCwWD
@w]ACCiFeldman, 1989; EgEEEEVEEC1989GcEOEJEC1999; Eiszler, 2002jDw]AfNiHoward & Maxwell, 1980; Gaede & Lewis, 2005jD
@ClCt@wCC]wf(teaching effectiveness model)D]wfiex. Brown, 1976).w]]lpllD
@CタCw]CeDlfCwvNlDwptH[}Xvw@ef(prior characteristics model)(ex. Hoyt, 1973; EC2005a)Dw@wptH[}XC]lfD
@w@w]e^lゥDCタf[^CvCミIAvelDw]CCw]w]DCIblDlCgrading leniency model(ex. Bausell & Magoon, 1972: Greenwald & Gillmore, 1997)D`C{IwゥタCw]fDfC]lDP]DfCw]]CCt[VNlWiex. Nelson & Lynch, 1984; Eiszler, 2002; Centra, 2003)D
@CA_(Marsh & Roche, 2000)DNA]DA_CCゥIvACCOIvADlKpCwゥ\AC]DCwCADC]^D
@grading leniency modelA_CxゥxiKiK]゚lDCJtFeAX^Cws]C\\lDC{qC]sCゥxッvDCgrading leniency modelA_C{ggKpDteaching effectiveness modelprior characteristics modelgglD
@cEc(2003)C]sCwsijADCIWC]wsLoCpXCゥ]wsADCcEcCP]wsACwK\}X^[WCゥ]wswEDCYBWKDLfprior characteristics modelxヲDfC@]lDCw]Iteaching effectiveness modelvD

1.3@Lp

@cEcCwsS]SADSCw@vEC]we^\liEC2005aC2005bjDC{CCeY]AD
@C]タ{D]sCCesCDCPwSU]@DCSyCqeD
@]PwCfC]C]lDCrCwrsDC]wClDCv.C]wCwlClDCw]LplD
@C{C]WCw]LpD

QD@

2.1@メ

@2001NxR~jP[V_kBsww110ij55C55jDwNQNSND

2.2@y

@CwlWwyowocwIJuDQwwuD2001NxPwTPDu`12sDee[}\PヲD


@C100__ULqョCeeyz_\QヲDCSiCsD



2.3@]

@]CzzR~jP[VJ[hCxxV@DP`VClxyxDR~jP[VJ[hCwoICwソ`BR~jP[VDBUTCYCwCCLD12u`CR~jP[VJ[hpC10DCg_NVCCiKCLョ]sCR~jP[VJ[hzzD

RD

3.1@w

@xyxC]lCwellZoD100__f_\RヲDxCxC\RヲDxxCxCxWCLDxCx}}Py}QヲD




@CwoCSiKsDoCR~jP[VJ[hoJEgD12R~jP[VJ[ho10Co10DeiKCoO`PCQ`SCT`VCW`10DoiKCxCx\RヲDoiKCx(F=.574, df=3/103, n.s.)CxL(F=3.23, df=3/103, p<.05; F=16.25, df=3/106, p<.01)DBonferroni@drCTLCxoO`PW`10DCoO`PQ`SCO`PT`VLD
@xx]lWC}R`}10ヲDWZoCoW`10wCxx(.349; .480)ヲCoQ`Sw(-.522; -.476)ヲDCOLi\RjD






3.2@

@eS_lWZoCCoSiK_lZoi\SjDoSiK_CPCSLiF=2.02, df=3/106, n.s.; F=.57, df=3/106, n.s.jCQCRCTCULiF=3.87, df=3/106, p<.05; F=6.88, df=3/106, p<.01; F=7.46, df=3/106, p<.01; F=13.84, df=3/106, p<.01jDBonferroni@drCTLCDQoQ`SW`10CRCToO`PW`10yoQ`SW`10CUoW`10oiKD


@eeYwxx]l\TヲDCYR~jP[VJ[hoPSヲD,oiKZoCoSCYowClCoT`VyoW`10wヲDCxxei\UjDCTLCPSwxCxCoW`10wxCQoT`VxCoW`10xDRCSLD




S.l@

4.1@W

@I\D[CtCSClDClDC{CCR~jP[VJ[hxxqCQ\Dタf[^\RヲCxxD

4.2@Fッ

@lDCwx^KvDwCPiC2005jDCCxsCCDCタ{Iue^vDCuゥC\\D_l{l@ClD
@wSCxi\RjDoiKsCoW`10wCCoQ`SwDoW`10wゥFッlDCoQ`Swx]wCCゥxFッ\lDx]wCゥoCゥwKDoO`PT`VCLvIWCLolD
@WCPCSxWLCOQ`SCWi\UjDCゥvelDPCz_Q`TrC_i\SjDPC\^(Norman & Bobrow, 1975)l.CsxClDQCoT`VwLヲDqFッpvDQSCxFッwlDSC_DS_zC_メCxCf[^^(Norman & Bobrow, 1975)\DrICCwClDRmfC_zQCxFッ\D
@,{@_IlD]IY]KD]sC90S]C90bXeDCYe]DCe]W`lD

4.3@wK@

@CLlCxWWヲlDCoQ`SoW`10wCxWlWi\RjD
@CCeCtCeCKCWWCDC_e\CCKCs\CwlD
@xWi\UjCPSwL(r=.327)CoW`10wC(r=.439)ヲDCxヲlヲD_CC゚DCxCxlDlXQoW`10wD
@CoW`10wCxDCP]lヲD\PヲCoW`10wCowxlDCowCxDCxolfDowwCcEcq}X^[WlDolC}X^[WCC]ClD

T.l@

5.1@]W

@{Cw]C]WDCタ]wiv^CPWB,C_BFッKC_BCWovB
@wivC]s_s_IB]iujBBtKCeYC\BSwB
@CFッBwKzDCCタ\DCxCtC]I]B{xCowI]i\RjDC_ヲDCC^_oCッlD
@CCwK~@゚DWCxWxヲDuCC\lD,Wヲ,oW`10wBowCIC}X^[WDcEcC}X^[W]ClD
@]WSfCQfteaching effectiveness modelprior characteristics model{lD{CCwElD

5.2@w]

@w]DCK_ヲ(Gaski, 1987; Greenwald & Gillmore, 1997; Algozzine et al., 2004)Dw]ClXvIWDX_CX_IINC_CKpE_DCCタ]CX_vEDv^_CvIO[ofiAbrami, d'Apollonia & Cohen, 1990; Marsh & Roche, 1997) CD
@w]C]レxIゥRLqCC]レxゥRLqlKvD{C]レx]D]レxCwタ{C]ll\ltB[hobNCPC]lD{CPwUe_CC]sDC90eEDeYRD
@CWCwFッCwCwxfDx]oC\ICD]C]C]CfDC]WCteaching effectiveness modelprior characteristics modelヲDC]e^CtCwvD
@w]CタCC吾k\`C\Iw]l]DKw]]lWC{WクD

5.3@]Lp

@w]]sC]レxwlfIDlCK]CCrD
@Cw]f[^CIvC]l]D]Cw]]pTdDCvCCxDCタpCo]vAmDClpゥCwID
@Cl]DCl\DwCヲwCDlD{Cヲ@iCw}X^[WlDJLCwuDSuwDl]Cw]CS]D

5.4@PLp

@w]]レxPDqC]l\llfCPKvfsD
@Cw]ゥPlD]LpC]P@DCD]CタsCDCタNx~PDPCCONxsDCw]CPlD]タ{]]liYC2005jCC@lD
@,w]nC]llD,]xpCDC]llDClCw]pIsIDCw]OKvD,qw]KD]lIC]]PWDeNjJ]lWCWDw}\C{OWPsiTbNXC2000jD
@PKvCIeCCCPDw]]lD]lwviEC2005ajlCID
@{pR~jP[VJ[hC{w_`J[hDIw_CCePD]CtIqC]IDタwCqC`貞SOCCID
@{ソICwR~jP[VKviEC2005ajDwR~jP[V,u]vX^CKvD

Ql


1 {C2005NxkBswBC{CBSw66i2005N11j\B